Tenders

Highways Professional Services Framework

Open
Deadline
127 days left
July 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
018137-2026
Value
£120,000,000
Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

July 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

July 08, 2026

Contract Start Date

October 05, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£120,000,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Merseyside
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Liverpool City Council (LCC) intends to invite suppliers to tender for a new version of the Professional Services Framework (the PSF) to commence from October 2026. The current PSF is due to expire in October 2026, with LCC requiring similar services and commissions from the consultancy market to support planned delivery from October / November 2026. The framework will be split into the following four (4) lots: Lot 1 - Sustainable Transport Planning and Policy Advice Lot 2 - Highways and Infrastructure Design Support Services Lot 3 - P&P Management and NEC Contract Administration Support Services Lot 4 - Commercial and Contract Management Support Services

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (4)
Compliance (3)
Technical (4)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-07-08T00:00:00.
--Bids must be submitted in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, or Lithuanian.
--Bidders must clearly indicate which lot(s) they are bidding for.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS4
--Bidders may be excluded if they are in a state of insolvency, liquidation, or have ceased trading, or are subject to bankruptcy proceedings.
--Bidders may be excluded if they have been convicted of an offense relating to fraud, corruption, or money laundering.
--Bidders may be excluded if they have committed grave professional misconduct.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must be legally established and registered to operate in their country of establishment.
--Bidders must demonstrate they have the necessary legal and financial capacity to perform the contract.
--Bidders must not be subject to any conflict of interest that could compromise the integrity of the procurement process.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must demonstrate relevant experience in providing highways consultancy services, specifically in the areas covered by the four lots.
--Bidders must provide evidence of successfully completed projects of a similar nature and scale.
--Bidders must outline their proposed approach and methodology for delivering the services.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must demonstrate sufficient financial standing to undertake the framework, with a total value of 120,000,000 EUR over 48 months.
--Bidders may be required to provide financial statements or other evidence of their economic and financial capacity.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a Highways Professional Services Framework is generally well-structured with clear lot divisions and a substantial estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and a competitive flexible procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the complexity and value. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description of services and the division into four lots are clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves potential bidders uncertain about how their submissions will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration are present. However, the lack of available content for the tender documents is a significant omission, preventing a full assessment of completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The division into lots allows for specialized bidding. The absence of specific company tailoring is noted positively. However, the lack of document content and evaluation criteria could be perceived as a fairness concern for bidders.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents hinders practical access and submission for potential bidders.

No e-submission
Document URL missing
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, contributing to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided information, indicating a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear division into four lots
Substantial estimated value disclosed
Open procedure
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
No e-submission specified
Potential for a tight submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Provide specific evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Make full tender documents accessible with clear URLs and submission instructions.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria into the tender.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline