Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly states its adherence to relevant UK procurement regulations for future stages, and the PME itself is a legitimate pre-procurement activity. However, the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are unpopulated, which is a minor data quality issue.
•Unpopulated 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields
•Missing 'Liable Person'
Clarity90/100
The purpose, scope, and non-prejudicial nature of this preliminary market engagement are exceptionally clear. Requirements for participation are well-defined and understandable, appropriate for a market sounding exercise.
Completeness70/100
While essential information like title, organization, and deadlines are present, the structured data fields for 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' are unpopulated. The estimated value is intentionally classified, which is acceptable for a PME.
•Unpopulated 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' fields
Fairness90/100
The tender explicitly states that participation is non-prejudicial, provides full document access via an e-sourcing portal, and sets reasonable deadlines for a questionnaire. Requirements are generic and not tailored to a specific company.
Practicality85/100
Electronic submission is fully supported via the Delta eSourcing portal, and all necessary URLs are provided. Projected contract dates are also clearly stated, enhancing practicality for potential respondents.
Data Consistency75/100
Key dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' fields are inconsistently populated as 'None' or empty, indicating minor data entry gaps.
•Inconsistent population of 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' fields
Sustainability50/100
The preliminary market engagement does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation as specific requirements or areas of focus, which is common for an initial market sounding.
•No explicit sustainability or innovation focus