Legal Compliance100/100
The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) is a legally permissible procurement tool. However, classifying the procedure as 'Restricted' for the establishment of a DPS raises significant legal and procedural questions, as DPS are typically open to all qualified suppliers throughout their validity, promoting broader competition.
Clarity40/100
The description of the 17 lots is clear and well-categorized, providing a good overview of the scope. Conversely, the complete absence of specific mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements in this notice significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders.
Completeness66/100
As a Prior Information Notice, it provides a high-level overview. However, as a basis for understanding the actual tender, it is highly incomplete, lacking all substantive requirements, evaluation criteria, and supporting documents.
Fairness60/100
The broad range of lots suggests an inclusive approach to various service providers. However, the classification of the DPS setup as a 'Restricted procedure' inherently limits competition and raises concerns about fairness, potentially excluding qualified suppliers from joining the system.
Practicality20/100
The DPS framework itself is a practical approach for managing diverse and ongoing communication and print needs. The lack of specific requirements in this notice, however, makes it impractical for potential bidders to assess their suitability or prepare for submission without accessing the full tender documents.
Data Consistency100/100
The information provided within the notice is internally consistent.
Sustainability25/100
No information regarding sustainability criteria or green procurement initiatives is present in the provided notice.