Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and the submission period is legally sufficient. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria in the provided information represents a notable gap in legal compliance with standard procurement regulations.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
•No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity60/100
The service description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and understandable. Nevertheless, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a critical flaw, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Lack of specific, measurable performance conditions
Completeness55/100
Basic information, financial details, and timelines are well-populated. However, the tender lacks comprehensive core documents such as detailed specifications, instructions to bidders, or a draft contract, with only administrative and OCDS data provided. The absence of evaluation criteria also contributes to incompleteness.
•Lack of comprehensive tender documents (e.g., ITT, full specification, draft contract)
•No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness40/100
The tender value is disclosed, and requirements do not appear tailored. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity. The lack of electronic submission and a potentially tight deadline for a complex, high-value contract further reduce fairness and equal access for bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified, impacting transparency and objectivity
•No electronic submission option
Practicality65/100
Contract start date, duration, and financing information are clearly provided. The significant drawback is the stated lack of electronic submission, which is a major practical inefficiency in modern procurement processes.
•No electronic submission supported
Data Consistency90/100
All key fields are populated, and the data provided is largely consistent across different sections, including financial figures and timelines. There are no apparent disputes or suspensions.
Sustainability60/100
The service itself is inherently social, addressing critical public health challenges and supporting vulnerable communities. However, the tender does not explicitly include additional green procurement criteria, innovation focus, or specific social value clauses beyond the core service delivery.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit innovation focus