Tenders

Preliminary Market Engagement for Asset Management and Computer Aided Facilities Management (CAFM) Software

Open
Deadline
17 days left
March 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
017664-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 20, 2026

Contract Start Date

September 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

CST265 Preliminary Market Engagement for Asset Management and Computer Aided Facilities Management (CAFM) Software

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This is a preliminary market engagement notice for Asset Management and CAFM software. While generally well-structured with clear basic information and specified requirements, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial value, impacting completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The notice adheres to general regulatory requirements by providing a CPV code and specifying a deadline. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and the 'planning' status suggest it's an early-stage engagement rather than a formal tender, which could affect its direct legal compliance as a procurement notice. The deadline of March 20, 2026, for a notice dated February 27, 2026, is reasonable.

Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly indicate the subject of the engagement. The AI-extracted requirements list general categories (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission), providing a framework. However, the lack of specific details within these categories and the absence of document content limit the overall clarity for potential participants.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Key information such as the title, reference, organization, and CPV code is present. The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the content of the tender documents is unavailable, which significantly impacts completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The notice provides access to the basic tender information and specifies general requirement categories. The value is classified but not disclosed, which is a moderate concern for fairness. The deadlines appear reasonable for a preliminary engagement. The lack of specific evaluation criteria means potential bidders cannot fully assess how their submissions will be judged.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The notice specifies a contract duration and start date. However, it does not mention e-submission, and the availability of document content is zero, hindering practical engagement. Financing information is not provided.

No e-submission mentioned
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (notice date, deadline, contract start) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The notice does not mention any specific green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria within this preliminary engagement.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and CPV code specified
General requirements outlined
Reasonable contract duration and start date

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No document content available
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Provide access to the full content of the tender documents.
3. Specify clear evaluation criteria for the engagement.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline