Tenders

Processing of Co-mingled Dry Mixed Recycling

Open
Deadline
1 days left
March 04, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
010894-2026
Value
£9,600,000
Location
Yorkshire and the Humber, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 04, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 01, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£9,600,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Yorkshire and the Humber
Type
Other
73
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Processing of Co-mingled Dry Mixed Recycling to process recyclate, maximise recycling rate and maximise value return to Council

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (7)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Must submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-04 at 12:00:00 UTC.
--Must provide information demonstrating how the bid meets the quality criteria (40% weighting).
--Must provide information demonstrating how the bid meets the social value criteria (10% weighting).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The provided information does not explicitly state any mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be a legal entity capable of contracting with City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council.
--Must demonstrate commitment to social value, as this constitutes 10% of the evaluation criteria.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Must be capable of providing refuse recycling services (CPV 90514000).
--Must be capable of processing co-mingled dry mixed recycling.
--Must be able to process recyclate effectively.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Must submit a competitive price for the services, as price constitutes 50% of the evaluation criteria.
--Must be financially capable of undertaking a contract with an estimated value of 9,600,000 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
010894-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS Record provides structured, open data about the tender for refuse recycling services, detailing the processing of co-mingled dry mixed recycling for the City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
010894-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured data on the City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council's tender for co-mingled dry mixed recycling services, including buyer details and tender initiation information.

Official PDF VersionPDF
010894-2026_official.pdf

This document is a tender notice from the City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council for the processing of co-mingled dry mixed recycling, detailing an estimated £8M contract from April 2026 to March 2030, with submissions due by March 4, 2026, and evaluation based on price (50%), quality (40%), and social value (10%).

Tender NoticeHTM
010894-2026.html

This tender notice from City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council invites bids for a 4-year contract, valued at £8M, for processing co-mingled dry mixed recycling, with submissions due by March 4, 2026, and evaluated on price (50%), quality (40%), and social value (10%).

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

73
Good

Tender Quality Score

This is a generally good tender with clear requirements and a strong focus on social value and environmental sustainability, but it has notable deficiencies regarding e-submission and certain documentation completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

Legal compliance is generally good, with a clearly defined open procedure and appropriate CPV codes. However, the explicit mandatory exclusion grounds are not stated, and the reveal date is missing, which are minor compliance gaps.

Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly stated
Missing reveal date
Clarity85/100

The tender is very clear and understandable. The description is unambiguous, requirements are well-documented, and evaluation criteria (Price 50%, Quality 40%, Social Value 10%) are explicitly stated, despite automated flags suggesting otherwise.

Completeness70/100

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are all present. However, crucial details regarding the 'Divided into Parts' characteristic are missing, as are explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and the tender's reveal date.

Missing details on 'Divided into Parts'
Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly stated
Fairness65/100

The tender value is disclosed, and evaluation criteria are objective and transparent. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. The primary concern for fairness is the explicit lack of e-submission, which can create barriers to equal access for bidders.

No e-submission support
Practicality60/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback, increasing administrative burden for bidders. A direct document URL is also not provided.

No e-submission support
Document URL not explicitly provided
Data Consistency85/100

Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical and consistent. A minor inconsistency exists between the automated flag for missing evaluation criteria and the content explicitly stating them.

Minor field gaps (e.g., Liable Person)
Contradiction regarding evaluation criteria flag vs. content
Sustainability80/100

The tender scores well on sustainability due to its core service being refuse recycling, aiming to maximize recycling rates (environmental focus). It also explicitly includes social value as 10% of the evaluation criteria. Innovation focus is not explicitly mentioned.

No explicit innovation focus

Strengths

Clear and well-defined requirements and evaluation criteria
Strong focus on environmental sustainability (recycling rate)
Explicit inclusion of social value in evaluation (10%)
Value, duration, and contract start date are clearly specified
Open procedure type promotes competition

Concerns

Lack of electronic submission support (e-submission)
Missing detailed information on 'Divided into Parts'
Absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing tender reveal date
No explicit innovation focus

Recommendations

1. Implement electronic submission to enhance fairness and practicality.
2. Provide detailed information on how the tender is 'Divided into Parts' to improve completeness and clarity.
3. Explicitly state all mandatory exclusion grounds in the tender documentation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline