Asbestos Abatement Framework; 2026 - 2030

This tender provides basic information clearly but suffers from significant gaps in critical areas such as evaluation criteria, specific financial requirements, and mandatory exclusion grounds. The lack of e-submission and any sustainability considerations are notable weaknesses.

The procedure type is clearly defined, and there are no disputes. However, the missing reveal date prevents a full assessment of the reasonableness of the preparation period, and the summary lacks specific mandatory exclusion grounds.

The description of services and lot breakdown is clear. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria, along with the lack of specific financial requirements and detailed performance conditions, significantly reduces the overall clarity of the tender.

While basic information, value, duration, and location are provided, the tender is incomplete regarding crucial elements such as evaluation criteria, specific financial requirements, and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds. The listed documents also appear to be primarily administrative, with one failing to download.

The absence of evaluation criteria is a severe fairness issue, as it prevents bidders from understanding how their proposals will be judged. The lack of e-submission also creates a barrier to equal access, despite requirements not appearing to be tailored.

The lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback, hindering efficiency and accessibility for bidders. The failed download of a key document also indicates practical issues with document access.

Dates are logical and consistent. However, several key fields, such as 'Liable Person' and procedure codes, are unpopulated or missing, and the reveal date is absent, indicating minor data inconsistencies.

The tender completely lacks any mention or integration of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a significant oversight in modern procurement best practices.