Tenders

Dynamic Purchasing System for the Provision of Foundation Apprenticeships for Aberdeenshire Council

Open
Deadline
27 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
017516-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
North Eastern Scotland, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
60 months
Location
North Eastern Scotland
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for the Provision of Foundation Apprenticeships for Aberdeenshire Council. The DPS is divided into the following lots: Lot 1 Level 6 Foundation Apprenticeships, Lot 2 Level 4 and 5 Foundation Apprenticeships, Lot 3 Any other related projects.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a Dynamic Purchasing System for Foundation Apprenticeships is generally well-structured, with clear lot divisions and specified requirements. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and detailed evaluation criteria impacts completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows a restricted procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the nature of a DPS. No disputes are reported. The overall legal compliance is good, but the absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural issue.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the Dynamic Purchasing System and its lots is clear. Mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are listed, indicating a structured approach to defining needs. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which is a significant clarity issue.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and duration is present. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the content of the tender documents is not available, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is described as e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The division into lots allows for broader participation. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and unspecified evaluation criteria could potentially lead to subjective assessments, impacting fairness. Requirements are listed generically, not tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and needs clarification. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent, reducing practicality.

No e-submission (contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and duration are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically presented, with a clear submission deadline. The 'Missing reveal date' is a minor inconsistency.

Missing reveal date
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria within the tender documentation.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear division into lots for flexibility
Specified CPV and NUTS codes
Mandatory requirements listed
E-Procurement characteristic noted

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Content of tender documents not available
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the DPS.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria for lot selection.
3. Provide access to the full content of the tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline