Legal Compliance75/100
As a Preliminary Market Engagement (PME) notice, formal procedure types and full legal frameworks are not yet defined, which is expected. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no reported disputes. The PME itself adheres to principles of transparency by engaging the market early.
•Formal procedure type is not defined (expected for PME)
•Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100
The description of the Court Funds Office's services and the objectives for digital transformation are exceptionally clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted technical requirements are well-defined and understandable, providing a solid foundation for future tender development.
•Formal evaluation criteria, performance conditions, and detailed eligibility/financial/submission requirements are not yet specified (expected for PME)
Completeness70/100
The notice provides all essential basic information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and location. While specific formal tender requirements (exclusion, eligibility, financial, submission, evaluation criteria) are explicitly stated as not available, this is consistent with its PME status.
•Missing detailed formal tender requirements and evaluation criteria (expected for PME)
Fairness85/100
The estimated value is disclosed, and documents are accessible, promoting transparency. The PME itself is a mechanism to enhance fairness by gathering market input before formal tender. While evaluation criteria are not yet specified, this is appropriate for the planning stage. The mention of Legal & General is descriptive of the current service, not a restrictive requirement.
•No e-submission capability mentioned, which can hinder equal access for some bidders
Practicality65/100
Key practical details such as contract start date, duration, and estimated financing are clearly provided. However, the absence of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback for modern procurement processes, even at the PME stage.
•No electronic submission support
Data Consistency90/100
The tender information exhibits high data consistency. Key fields are populated, dates are logical and consistent with a long-term project timeline, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. Minor empty fields like "Liable Person" are not critical for a PME.
•"Liable Person" field is empty
•"Type" and "Procedure" are "None" (expected for PME)
Sustainability50/100
The tender demonstrates a strong focus on innovation through its aim for complete digital transformation and efficiency improvements. However, it currently lacks explicit mention of green procurement or social responsibility criteria, which are increasingly vital aspects of modern public procurement.
•No explicit green procurement or social criteria