Legal Compliance35/100
The tender critically lacks a defined procedure type and information on mandatory exclusion grounds, which are fundamental legal requirements. The 'planning' status with an active submission deadline is a major inconsistency, raising concerns about its legal standing and adherence to procurement regulations.
•Undefined procedure type (Type: None, Procedure: None)
•No information provided regarding mandatory exclusion grounds
Clarity65/100
While the service description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and understandable, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant drawback, making it difficult for potential bidders to formulate competitive proposals.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness55/100
The tender is incomplete as all listed documents are general information/OCDS data and marked 'Required: No', suggesting that comprehensive tender specifications and application forms are missing. The absence of evaluation criteria further contributes to its incompleteness.
•Lack of comprehensive tender documents (all listed documents are 'Required: No')
•No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness45/100
Fairness is severely compromised by the apparent lack of full tender documentation, the absence of transparent evaluation criteria, and the lack of an e-submission option. These factors hinder equal access and the ability of all potential bidders to compete on a level playing field.
•Lack of full document access (all listed documents are 'Required: No')
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality55/100
The absence of electronic submission capabilities and a direct document URL makes the tender process less practical for bidders. While contract duration and start date are clear, the overall accessibility and ease of participation are limited.
•No electronic submission supported
•No document URL provided
Data Consistency45/100
Significant data inconsistencies are present, notably the 'planning' status conflicting with an active submission deadline. Key fields like 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' are unpopulated, and mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly missing, indicating a poorly structured or prematurely published tender.
•Inconsistent 'planning' status with an active submission deadline
•Missing 'Type' and 'Procedure' definitions
Sustainability75/100
The tender's core objective of providing youth activities and safe spaces inherently addresses significant social aspects, which is a strong positive. However, it lacks explicit criteria or focus on green procurement or innovation.
•Not green procurement
•No innovation focus