Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login10 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
4 documents available with AI summaries
The Liverpool City Region Combined Authority is establishing a multi-supplier framework for asbestos abatement services, divided into three lots: removal & disposal, encasement, and paint removal, with an estimated value of £8-10 million over nearly four years.
This OCDS record provides structured data about an upcoming framework agreement by Liverpool City Region Combined Authority for asbestos removal, encasement, and paint removal, split into three multi-supplier lots.
This OCDS data package provides structured information about the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority's planned framework tender for asbestos works, including removal, encasement, and paint removal, across three multi-supplier lots.
The Liverpool City Region Combined Authority is seeking multiple suppliers for a framework agreement to undertake asbestos works (removal, encasement, paint removal, and associated services) across three lots, with an estimated total value of £8-10 million, requiring competence in various environments.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for asbestos abatement services is well-structured with clear lot divisions and basic information, but suffers from significant omissions regarding evaluation criteria, detailed financial requirements, and the lack of electronic submission.
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and there are no disputes. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant legal compliance concern regarding transparency and equal treatment. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.
The description of the framework and its three lots is clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted eligibility and technical requirements are also well-defined. However, the overall clarity for bidders is reduced by the complete absence of evaluation criteria.
Basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification are provided. Four documents are attached. However, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit lack of evaluation criteria and detailed financial requirements ('None specified').
The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements do not appear tailored. However, the absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness, as bidders cannot understand how their proposals will be judged. The lack of e-submission also creates a barrier to equal access.
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. A direct document URL is not explicitly provided in the summary.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Minor gaps include the empty 'Liable Person' field and 'None specified' for financial requirements.
The tender does not indicate any focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not identified as EU funded, which often implies higher sustainability standards.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required