Latvia, Latvia
Not disclosed
February 19, 2026 at 09:00
Other
163903
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender exhibits moderate quality with significant concerns regarding transparency and practicality, primarily due to missing evaluation criteria and inconsistencies in e-submission capabilities. While basic legal compliance and document availability are present, critical information gaps hinder a fully fair and efficient procurement process.
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes clearly, and the submission deadline is reasonable. Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned, indicating adherence to legal frameworks. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the 'Restricted document access' flag, if accurate, could pose a minor legal compliance issue regarding full transparency.
The service description and performance conditions are clear, and AI-extracted requirements for bidders are detailed. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major clarity issue, making it difficult for potential bidders to understand how their offers will be assessed and weighted.
Basic information, deadlines, duration, and location are adequately provided, and all 11 tender documents are available and summarized. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value and, more significantly, the missing evaluation criteria, which are essential for a comprehensive bid submission.
While submission deadlines are reasonable and technical requirements appear generic, the fairness of this tender is severely undermined by the undisclosed estimated value and the complete absence of transparent evaluation criteria. Furthermore, the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission' flags, along with 'Restricted document access', raises significant concerns about equal access and a level playing field.
The practicality is significantly hampered by the 'No e-submission' flag, which, if accurate, creates a major hurdle for bidders despite the 'E-Procurement' characteristic. The lack of a specific contract start date and undisclosed financing information also reduce the overall practicality for planning and resource allocation.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there are critical inconsistencies, notably the contradiction between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' flag. The 'Restricted document access' flag also conflicts with the availability of 11 summarized documents, indicating potential data integrity issues.
While the tender is for 'sustainability report verification services', which is inherently related to sustainability, the procurement process itself does not incorporate specific green, social, or innovation criteria for the selection of the service provider. It is also not EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes