Supply of mobile substations

This tender for mobile substations and vehicles is severely hampered by the complete absence of accessible tender documents and evaluation criteria, making it impossible for potential bidders to prepare a submission and raising significant transparency concerns.

The tender mentions mandatory exclusion grounds and is EU Funded, indicating adherence to general EU procurement principles. The 'negotiated procedure with a call' is a valid procurement type. However, the lack of accessible full regulations and documents prevents a comprehensive legal compliance assessment.

While the brief description and extracted requirements are clear in their limited scope, the complete absence of tender documents, annexes, and detailed regulations renders the overall clarity of the procurement process extremely poor for potential bidders.

The tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of any attached documents, full regulations, and crucial information such as evaluation criteria, contract duration, and specific location details. This makes it impossible for bidders to formulate a compliant offer.

The restricted document access and complete absence of evaluation criteria severely undermine the fairness and transparency of this procurement. Without these, bidders cannot understand the basis for award, potentially favoring those with prior insider information. The technical requirements for both transformers and tractors, while logical given the description, could be restrictive if not clearly justified and detailed in the missing documents.

The practicality for bidders is extremely low. With no documents available, it is impossible for any interested party to prepare a bid. The absence of e-submission also indicates a less efficient and modern procurement process.

Based on the limited extracted information, there are no apparent inconsistencies. However, a full assessment of data consistency is impossible without access to the complete tender documentation.

The automated check explicitly flags that this is 'Not green procurement', indicating a missed opportunity to integrate environmental and social considerations into a significant public contract.