Tenders

VAUGHAN HOUSE CSIP REFURBISHMENT WORKS

Open
Deadline
17 days left
March 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
011054-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom
Published
February 16, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 13, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
6 months
Location
Merseyside
Type
Other
69
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

This contract is for the provision of CSIP Refurbishment Works at Vaughan House.

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Submit bids exclusively via The Riverside Group Limited's e-tendering portal (In-Tend portal).
--Submit bids by the deadline of March 13, 2026, at 12:00:00+00:00.
--Follow the guide for using the e-tendering portal for registration, login, and bid submission.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided summaries. Bidders should refer to the full tender documents for these requirements.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Register on The Riverside Group Limited's e-tendering portal (In-Tend portal).
--Log in to The Riverside Group Limited's e-tendering portal.
--Be a company capable of providing CSIP Refurbishment Works.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Demonstrate capability to perform CSIP Refurbishment Works at Vaughan House.
--Provide detailed information related to the quality aspect of the bid, as quality accounts for 65% of the award criteria.
--Adhere to the scope and requirements outlined in the full tender documents (specifically 011054-2026_official.pdf).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit a comprehensive price proposal for the CSIP Refurbishment Works, as price accounts for 35% of the award criteria.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Lot L-1HTM
L-1.html

This document serves as a guide for using The Riverside Group Limited's e-tendering portal, detailing how to register, log in, and submit bids for the CSIP Refurbishment Works tender.

OCDS RecordDOC
011054-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured information about the tender for CSIP Refurbishment Works at Vaughan House, including details about the contracting authority, The Riverside Group Limited.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
011054-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured data about the CSIP Refurbishment Works tender at Vaughan House, published by The Riverside Group Limited.

Official PDF VersionPDF
011054-2026_official.pdf

This document outlines the requirements for CSIP Refurbishment Works at Vaughan House for The Riverside Group Limited.

Tender NoticeHTM
011054-2026.html

This tender notice from The Riverside Group Limited invites bids for CSIP Refurbishment Works at Vaughan House, detailing the scope, submission deadline of March 13, 2026, and award criteria of 65% quality and 35% price, with full tender documents available on their In-Tend portal.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

69
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for refurbishment works demonstrates good clarity on evaluation criteria and utilizes an e-tendering portal, but suffers from a lack of transparency regarding the estimated contract value and absence of sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and there are no reported disputes. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value, even for a below-threshold tender, raises transparency concerns that could impact compliance with best practices, though not necessarily a direct legal breach for this type of procedure.

Estimated value not disclosed
Clarity80/100

The tender description is concise and the evaluation criteria (65% quality, 35% price) are clearly stated. AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview, directing bidders to full documents for specifics, which is standard practice.

Description is brief, requiring full document review for detailed scope
Completeness70/100

Most essential information like title, organization, deadlines, duration, and documents are provided. However, the estimated contract value is explicitly not disclosed, and some basic fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are empty, which are notable gaps.

Estimated value not disclosed
'Liable Person' and procedure codes are empty
Fairness60/100

Full document access and e-procurement via a dedicated portal promote equal access. The evaluation criteria split is transparent, and requirements appear generic. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated contract value significantly hinders fairness by preventing potential bidders from adequately assessing the opportunity and preparing competitive bids.

Estimated contract value is not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender supports electronic submission, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. The availability of documents via the e-tendering portal is practical. The lack of an estimated value, however, can make it impractical for bidders to gauge the financial scale of the project.

Estimated value not disclosed
Data Consistency70/100

Dates are logical and there are no reported disputes. However, several key fields are unpopulated (e.g., Liable Person, Type Code, Procedure Code, Estimated Value), indicating inconsistencies in data entry.

Several key fields are unpopulated
Sustainability50/100

The tender documentation does not include any explicit criteria or mentions related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles.

No sustainability criteria (environmental, social, innovation) mentioned

Strengths

Clear definition of procedure type and CPV code
Utilizes an e-tendering portal for submission, promoting accessibility
Evaluation criteria (65% quality, 35% price) are clearly specified
All tender documents are available and summarized
Contract duration and start date are clearly stated

Concerns

Estimated contract value is not disclosed, impacting transparency and fairness
Absence of explicit sustainability (green, social, innovation) criteria
Some key administrative fields (e.g., Liable Person, procedure codes) are unpopulated
The tender description is brief, requiring detailed review of full documents
Mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed in the summary

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency and facilitate informed bidding.
2. Integrate specific sustainability criteria (environmental, social, innovation) into future tenders.
3. Ensure all mandatory administrative fields are fully populated for improved data quality and completeness.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Loading competitor predictions...

Add to Pipeline