Foel Gron Mynytho School Safe Paths

This tender suffers from significant deficiencies in clarity and completeness, primarily due to the absence of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria within the provided summary, relying heavily on an external portal for critical information. This severely impacts fairness and transparency.

The procedure type and CPV code are correctly defined, and there are no disputes. However, the tender notice summaries explicitly state that mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements are 'Not specified', directing users to an external portal. This lack of self-contained disclosure in the provided information is a compliance weakness.

The description of the works is minimal. Crucially, the AI-extracted requirements explicitly state that eligibility, technical capability, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are 'Not specified in the provided tender notice summaries'. This makes the tender information provided highly unclear regarding fundamental aspects.

While basic information like title, organization, value, and deadlines are present, the tender is critically incomplete regarding detailed requirements (eligibility, technical, financial) and evaluation criteria. These essential components are explicitly stated as missing from the provided summaries, making the document content insufficient.

The use of an e-procurement portal and disclosed value are positive. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a severe fairness issue, as it prevents potential bidders from understanding the basis of award and preparing competitive proposals transparently.

Electronic submission is supported, and key dates (contract start, duration) are provided. However, the practicality of the provided tender summary is reduced by its heavy reliance on an external e-tendering portal for all detailed requirements and criteria, making it less self-sufficient for initial assessment.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and an unspecified code for the 'Type' field.

There is no indication of green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding within the provided tender information. This suggests a complete absence of sustainability considerations.