Quarry House External Maintenance and Re-Roofing Project

This tender for external maintenance and re-roofing at Quarry House provides clear work descriptions and practical submission details. However, it significantly lacks explicit evaluation criteria and detailed eligibility/financial requirements in the summary, impacting clarity, completeness, and fairness.

The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined, and there are no reported disputes. However, the tender lacks a specified reveal date, and crucial mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds are not explicitly detailed in the provided summary, requiring reference to external documents. The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the stated estimated value.

The description of the works required is clear and unambiguous. Nevertheless, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major clarity issue. Additionally, crucial requirements such as mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial criteria are not detailed in the provided summary, necessitating external document consultation.

Basic information including title, reference, organization, deadlines, estimated value, duration, and location are provided, and documents are linked. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of detailed mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements in the provided summary.

Full document access is provided via the eSourcing portal, requirements appear generic, and electronic submission is supported. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria significantly undermines transparency and fairness, as bidders cannot objectively understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Electronic submission is clearly supported through the provided Delta eSourcing portal links, and a document URL is available. The contract start date and duration are explicitly stated. While a 1-month duration for re-roofing might be challenging, it is clearly specified.

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, procedure codes are missing, and the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the explicit statement of the estimated value. The missing tender reveal date also represents a data gap.

The tender does not include any explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which typically correlates with higher sustainability standards.