Legal Compliance65/100
The notice clearly defines the pre-market engagement phase and provides reasonable time for expression of interest. However, the formal 'Procedure Type' is missing, and the single CPV code provided is too narrow for a multi-lot framework covering diverse professional services, which are notable omissions even for a planning notice.
•Missing formal procurement procedure type
•CPV codes are insufficient for the full scope of the multi-lot framework
Clarity85/100
The description of the framework, its lots, and the purpose of the pre-market engagement sessions is exceptionally clear. Requirements for expressing interest are straightforward, and the overall intent of the notice is unambiguous.
Completeness70/100
Basic information such as title, organization, reference, estimated value, duration, and location (NUTS code) are well-provided. While full tender requirements and evaluation criteria are not present (as expected for a pre-market notice), the absence of a defined procedure type and comprehensive CPV codes reduces overall completeness.
•Missing formal procurement procedure type
•CPV codes are insufficient for the full scope of the multi-lot framework
Fairness85/100
The proactive pre-market engagement sessions, including virtual presentations and Q&A, significantly enhance fairness by providing clarity to all potential bidders before the formal tender release. The estimated value is disclosed, and requirements for this stage are generic. The use of a Delta e-sourcing platform suggests future e-procurement capabilities.
Practicality80/100
The notice provides a clear URL for further information and contact details for expressing interest. Key dates like contract start and duration are specified. While e-submission is not explicitly stated for the pre-market engagement (email is used), the underlying e-sourcing platform implies it will be supported for the actual tender.
Data Consistency90/100
All provided data fields are consistent and logical, with no apparent contradictions. Dates are sequential and make sense within the context of a planning notice leading to a future tender. There are no reported disputes or suspensions.
Sustainability20/100
The notice does not include any explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the framework's scope or evaluation criteria. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability considerations at this stage.
•No explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation)