Legal Compliance100/100
While the tender states adherence to PCR 2015 and the Light Touch Regime, the complete absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, specific eligibility criteria, financial requirements, and crucially, evaluation criteria, raises significant concerns regarding legal compliance and the ability to conduct a transparent and fair procurement process.
•Absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds
•Lack of specific financial requirements
Clarity40/100
The service description and the target audience (new providers) are clear. However, the overall clarity of the procurement process, specific requirements, and submission instructions is extremely poor due to the complete lack of supporting documentation.
•Unclear submission process and required documentation
•Lack of detailed technical and eligibility requirements
Completeness83/100
The tender information provided is critically incomplete. The absence of any actual tender documents, detailed specifications, terms and conditions, application forms, and comprehensive requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, evaluation criteria) makes it impossible for potential bidders to prepare a compliant and competitive offer.
•No tender documents attached or referenced
•Missing detailed specifications and terms
Fairness60/100
The explicit aim to invite 'new providers only' for Lot 1 promotes competition. However, the complete lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria creates a high risk of subjective decision-making, potentially undermining the fairness and equal treatment of bidders.
•High risk of subjective evaluation due to missing criteria
•Potential for unequal treatment without clear requirements
Practicality40/100
From a bidder's perspective, the tender is highly impractical. Without any documents, detailed requirements, or evaluation criteria, it is impossible to understand what is required to submit a valid application. This will likely deter potential qualified providers.
•Impossible for bidders to prepare a valid application
•High administrative burden for both contracting authority and bidders due to lack of clarity
Data Consistency100/100
The limited information provided is internally consistent. However, the significant gaps in information make it challenging to assess overall data consistency with standard procurement practices.
•Significant gaps in information prevent comprehensive consistency check
Sustainability25/100
The mention of 'Social Criteria' is positive, indicating an intent to consider social value. However, without any detailed tender documents or evaluation criteria, it is impossible to assess how these criteria will be defined, measured, or weighted in practice.
•Lack of detail on how 'Social Criteria' will be implemented and evaluated
•No explicit mention of environmental or innovation aspects