Mechanized cleaning of streets/roads, squares and sidewalks in Mārupe and Mārupe parish, Mārupe municipality

This tender for mechanized cleaning services is well-structured with clear requirements and an open procedure, but its overall quality is significantly undermined by the critical issue of restricted document access, which severely impacts fairness and practicality for potential bidders.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with a clearly defined open procedure, appropriate CPV codes, and no reported disputes. Mandatory exclusion grounds are referenced, and the submission period is reasonable.

The tender is highly clear, with a precise description of services, well-documented requirements across multiple attachments (technical specification, regulations, procurement requirements), and explicitly stated evaluation criteria (lowest price). Performance conditions are clearly linked to provided documents.

All essential information, including basic details, financial data, timelines, classification, and location, is comprehensively provided. Five key documents, including technical specifications and a draft contract, are attached and summarized.

While the tender benefits from an open procedure, disclosed value, objective evaluation criteria (lowest price), and e-procurement, the critical flag of "Restricted document access" severely compromises fairness. If bidders cannot fully access the tender documents, equal opportunity is fundamentally undermined.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the reported "Restricted document access" significantly hinders the practicality for bidders to prepare and submit a compliant offer. The absence of a direct document URL is a minor inconvenience.

Key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. While automated checks flagged some discrepancies (e.g., evaluation criteria, e-submission), the explicit tender data appears consistent.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green, social, or innovation criteria. This represents a missed opportunity to promote broader sustainability objectives within the procurement process.