Tenders

Treatment of Household and Fly-tipped Chemicals

Open
Deadline
17 days left
March 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
018012-2026
Value
£204,000
Location
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 20, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 12, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£204,000
Duration
60 months
Location
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Council invites Quotations for the provision of a collection point to accept delivery of Household Chemicals by Leicestershire Residents and Fly Tipped Chemicals collected by a Waste Collection Authority (WCA), and the subsequent treatment/disposal of such chemicals. The Supply of a Qualified Chemist as and when required.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for chemical waste treatment is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed documentation and explicit evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a specified CPV code and a clear open competition procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable for a below-threshold procurement. No immediate disputes or regulatory non-compliance are flagged.

Clarity80/100

The description of services required is clear, outlining the need for a collection point and subsequent treatment/disposal of chemicals, including the supply of a qualified chemist. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the lack of accessible tender documents with content significantly hinders completeness, as bidders cannot fully review the detailed requirements.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is below threshold, implying a potentially less complex but still open process. There are no obvious signs of requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of explicit mention of e-submission and the lack of accessible document URLs reduce its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document URL
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no flagged disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of services
Specified CPV code and NUTS code
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration
Open competition procedure

Concerns

Missing detailed tender documents
No specified evaluation criteria
Lack of explicit e-submission process
No sustainability considerations mentioned

Recommendations

1. Provide full tender documentation with clear content.
2. Specify detailed evaluation criteria for bidders.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline