United Kingdom3 days leftOpen

1004169075 2025-SUS-004 Cost Benefit Analysis of Noise Mitigation on the Rail Network

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Inner London - West, United Kingdom

VALUE

£180,000

DEADLINE

February 05, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

73110000

REFERENCE

000631-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

RSSB seeks to procure desktop research into rail noise mitigation options and associated analysis of noise maps. This work will inform the development of the England Noise Action Plan for rail, and help inform the development of future rail noise policy. For more information, visit the Delta eSourcing portal: https://www.delta-esourcing.com/tenders/UK-UK-London:-Research-services./F38W4E76Y8. To respond, click here: https://www.delta-esourcing.com/respond/F38W4E76Y8
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are provided in the tender information.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Be a legal entity capable of participating in an open procurement process.
  • Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) and Voluntary, Community and Social Enterprises (VCSEs) are welcomed to bid.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Ability to conduct desktop research into rail noise mitigation options.
  • Ability to perform associated analysis of noise maps.
  • Capacity to deliver work that will inform the development of the England Noise Action Plan for rail.
  • Capacity to deliver work that will help inform the development of future rail noise policy.
  • Demonstrate a clear understanding of the project requirements (evaluated as part of the 75% quality criteria).
  • Possess relevant experience in the field (evaluated as part of the 75% quality criteria).
  • Demonstrate effective project management capabilities (evaluated as part of the 75% quality criteria).
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit a cost proposal for the services (evaluated at 20% cost).
  • Propose a cost that is competitive and aligns with the estimated contract value of 180,000 EUR.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-02-05 12:00:00.
  • Submit the bid electronically via the Delta eSourcing portal using the provided link: https://www.delta-esourcing.com/respond/F38W4E76Y8.
  • The bid must include a quality proposal addressing understanding, experience, and project management.
  • The bid must include a cost proposal.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Official PDF Version
PDF000631-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
RSSB is seeking desktop research and analysis of rail noise mitigation options to inform future policy, valued at £150,000, with a submission deadline of February 5, 2026, and welcomes SMEs/VCSEs, evaluating bids on 75% quality (understanding, experience, project management) and 20% cost.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

68
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for rail noise mitigation research demonstrates a clear project scope and welcomes SMEs, but suffers from a critical lack of accessible tender documents and detailed evaluation criteria, hindering transparency and fair competition.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender appears to follow basic open competition principles for a below-threshold procurement. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summary is a notable omission that could impact legal robustness.

Absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summary.
Clarity40/100

The project description and core technical requirements are clearly stated. However, the lack of full tender documents and detailed evaluation criteria significantly reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

Lack of access to full tender documents.
Insufficient detail on the breakdown of quality evaluation criteria.
Completeness83/100

The provided information is highly incomplete due to the absence of any attached tender documents. This means critical details regarding terms, conditions, specific methodologies, and full evaluation criteria are missing.

No tender documents attached or available for review.
Missing detailed breakdown of evaluation criteria.
Fairness60/100

The open procedure and welcome to SMEs promote fairness. However, the lack of full documentation and detailed evaluation criteria creates an uneven playing field, potentially disadvantaging bidders who cannot infer unstated requirements.

Lack of full tender documents impedes fair competition.
Vague evaluation criteria for the 75% quality component.
Practicality40/100

The project scope and duration seem practical for desktop research. The electronic submission process is efficient. However, the absence of documents makes it impractical for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant proposal.

Bidders cannot practically prepare a comprehensive bid without full tender documents.
Data Consistency100/100

There is a minor inconsistency between the automated check stating 'No e-submission' and the extracted requirements explicitly mentioning electronic submission via Delta eSourcing. The extracted requirements are assumed to be correct.

Minor inconsistency regarding e-submission between automated check and extracted requirements (extracted requirements are assumed correct).
Sustainability25/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement or social criteria, which is a missed opportunity to promote broader sustainability objectives.

Absence of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear project description and objectives.
Open competition procedure promoting broad participation.
Explicitly welcomes Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs).
Electronic submission via a dedicated portal.

Concerns

Critical absence of any attached tender documents, preventing comprehensive understanding.
Lack of detailed breakdown for the 75% quality evaluation criteria.
Absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summary.
Missing explicit green procurement and social criteria.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all comprehensive tender documents, including detailed terms, conditions, and full evaluation criteria.
2. Provide a clear breakdown of the 75% quality criteria to ensure transparent and objective evaluation.
3. Include standard mandatory and discretionary exclusion grounds as per procurement regulations.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
68/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes