P0582 - Provision of an Occupational Health Service

This tender for occupational health services exhibits notable deficiencies in clarity, completeness, and fairness due to the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, despite clear basic information and electronic submission support.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code clearly, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of a reveal date and the lack of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summary represent significant omissions that could impact legal transparency and compliance.

The service description is clear, but the AI-extracted requirements are high-level and refer to external documents for detail. Critically, the tender explicitly lacks specified evaluation criteria, which is a major impediment to understanding how bids will be assessed.

While essential information like title, organization, value, duration, and location are provided, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds. Minor fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are also unpopulated.

The restricted procedure inherently limits competition, though it is a valid procurement method. The value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria severely undermines the objectivity and transparency of the assessment process, directly impacting fairness.

The tender states that electronic submission is required, which is a positive for practicality. Key dates (contract start, duration) and financial information are clearly specified. However, there is a contradiction between the AI-extracted requirements (electronic submission) and the automated check results (no e-submission), which creates ambiguity. An explicit document URL is also not provided.

Most dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes. However, there are minor inconsistencies such as the duration being stated as '36 months' in basic info but '3-5 years' in the tender notice summary and AI-extracted financial requirements. Additionally, some fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are unpopulated.

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or mentions related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.