Legal Compliance100/100
The tender information presents significant legal compliance risks due to the complete absence of tender documents, which are essential for transparency and equal treatment. The stated 'Restricted procedure' contradicts the 'Dynamic Purchasing System' (DPS) mentioned in the title, as DPS is an open procedure. The lack of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds is also a concern.
•Complete absence of tender documents, hindering transparency and equal treatment.
•Inconsistency between 'Restricted procedure' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System' (DPS).
Clarity40/100
Clarity is severely compromised by the complete absence of any tender documents. Without specifications, terms, or evaluation criteria, the scope and requirements of this high-value DPS are entirely unclear. The procedural inconsistency (Restricted vs. DPS) further adds to the lack of clarity.
•Complete absence of tender documents leading to total lack of clarity.
•Inconsistency in the stated procurement procedure (Restricted vs. DPS).
Completeness83/100
The tender is critically incomplete, as zero documents are attached or available. This means all essential information, including detailed specifications, evaluation criteria, contract terms, and application instructions, is missing, rendering the tender unworkable.
•Zero documents attached or available, making the tender critically incomplete.
•Missing detailed specifications, evaluation criteria, and contract terms.
Fairness60/100
The absence of any tender documents fundamentally undermines fairness and transparency, as potential bidders cannot access the information necessary to prepare a compliant and competitive offer. The procedural ambiguity (Restricted vs. DPS) could also lead to unequal treatment if not clarified.
•Lack of documents compromises fairness and transparency for all potential bidders.
•Procedural ambiguity (Restricted vs. DPS) may lead to unequal treatment.
Practicality40/100
It is entirely impractical for any potential supplier to prepare a submission for this tender given the complete lack of any supporting documents. Bidders cannot understand what is required, how to apply, or what terms will govern the contract.
•Impractical for bidders to respond without any tender documents.
•Inability for bidders to understand requirements, application process, or contract terms.
Data Consistency100/100
There is a significant inconsistency between the stated 'Restricted procedure' and the 'Dynamic Purchasing System' (DPS) indicated in the title. DPS is by nature an open procedure, not restricted. The absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds also represents a gap in standard procurement data.
•Inconsistency between 'Restricted procedure' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System' (DPS).
•Absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds.
Sustainability0/100
Based on the provided information and automated checks, there is no indication of green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus. Without tender documents, it is impossible to assess if these aspects are addressed.
•No indication of green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus.