Furniture supply and installation for the implementation of the project “Increasing the availability of community-based social services in Riga City Municipality”

This tender for furniture supply and installation presents significant concerns regarding transparency and fairness due to restricted document access and the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, despite being EU-funded and having clear basic information.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and the submission period is reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' and the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria are significant legal compliance issues, especially for an EU-funded open tender, hindering transparency and equal treatment.

The tender description is clear, and requirements are categorized effectively by the AI. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their offers will be assessed, severely impacting the clarity of the procurement process.

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided, and all listed documents have summaries. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the lack of specified evaluation criteria and the restricted access to full tender documents, which are essential for a comprehensive bid preparation.

Fairness is severely compromised by the restricted document access and the complete absence of evaluation criteria, which prevents objective and transparent assessment. The contradiction regarding e-procurement and e-submission also raises concerns about equal access for all potential bidders.

The tender's practicality is significantly reduced by the reported lack of electronic submission, which is a standard expectation in modern procurement. The absence of a direct document URL for public access and a specific contract start date further detracts from ease of participation.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. However, there is a notable inconsistency between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' flag, which requires clarification.

The tender explicitly lacks criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While the project itself serves a social purpose and is EU-funded, the tender documentation does not integrate sustainability considerations into the procurement process.