Tenders

Calibration and Maintenance of Radiological Instruments - Portable 2027+

Open
Deadline
9 days left
March 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
016737-2026
Value
£19,920,000
Location
Cheshire, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 12, 2026

Contract Start Date

March 31, 2027

Budget
£19,920,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Cheshire
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Calibration and Maintenance of Radiological Instruments - Portable 2027+ to cover all NRS Sites including additional sites (AGR transfers from EDF)

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is in the planning stage, with a clear description and estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and accessible document content, impacting its immediate usability.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender is in planning, so formal legal compliance aspects like specific deadlines and procedures are not yet fully defined. The CPV code is provided, and there are no reported disputes. The estimated value and duration are specified, which are positive indicators for future compliance.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, outlining the scope of calibration and maintenance for radiological instruments across NRS sites. The estimated value and contract duration are specified. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The CPV code is also provided. However, the lack of accessible document content and the absence of reveal date limit the completeness of the information available at this stage.

No document content available
Missing reveal date
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair with a disclosed value and objective CPV code. The requirements listed (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are standard. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of e-submission and the limited access to documents could be perceived as less fair.

No e-submission
Limited document access
Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are specified. However, the absence of an e-submission mechanism and the lack of readily available document URLs or content significantly reduce the practicality for potential bidders at this planning stage.

No e-submission
Document URL not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically sequenced, with the contract start date well after the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these sustainability dimensions.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Estimated value and contract duration specified
CPV code provided
No reported disputes

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
No e-submission mechanism
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria before publication.
2. Make all tender documents fully accessible with clear URLs.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline