Acquisition of road traffic equipment for Dobele Municipality

This tender for road traffic equipment acquisition demonstrates good clarity and legal adherence in its basic structure, but is significantly hampered by restricted document access and an undisclosed estimated value, which negatively impact fairness and completeness.

The tender defines a clear open procedure and assigns an appropriate CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no reported disputes. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern regarding transparency and equal treatment, which are fundamental legal compliance principles.

The tender's description is clear, and the evaluation criteria (lowest price) are explicitly stated in the AI-extracted requirements and document summaries. The presence of detailed documents like 'Nolikums' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības' suggests comprehensive information is available, although mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed in the summaries.

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, duration, and location, is provided. All four tender documents are listed and summarized. However, the 'Estimated Value: Not disclosed' is a notable omission that reduces the overall completeness of critical financial information.

Fairness is severely impacted by 'Restricted document access', which prevents equal opportunity for all potential bidders. The undisclosed estimated value also reduces transparency. While evaluation criteria are objective ('lowest price') and deadlines are reasonable, these positive aspects are overshadowed by the access limitations.

The tender specifies 'E-Procurement', which generally enhances practicality for submission. The contract duration is clear. However, the 'Restricted document access' makes it practically difficult for interested parties to prepare and submit a bid. The undisclosed estimated value also hinders practical financial planning.

Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, there is a contradiction between 'Characteristics: E-Procurement' and the automated check stating 'No e-submission'. The 'Estimated Value: Not disclosed' also represents a missing key data point.

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.