Legal Compliance75/100
While this is a preliminary market engagement notice, the tender document lacks crucial legal details such as the procedure type and liable person. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no disputes.
•Missing procedure type
•Missing liable person
Clarity80/100
The description of the solution and its requirements are very clear and understandable. The main drawback is the absence of evaluation criteria, which significantly reduces clarity for future bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
Basic information, documents, and location details are present. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and evaluation criteria are missing, as is the procedure type, which significantly impacts the completeness of the tender document.
•Estimated value not disclosed
•No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness60/100
The requirements themselves do not appear tailored. However, transparency and equal treatment are reduced by the undisclosed value, the absence of evaluation criteria, and the lack of e-submission support.
•Estimated value not disclosed
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of e-submission and the undisclosed value make practical planning difficult for potential suppliers.
•E-submission not supported
•Financing information (value) not available
Data Consistency80/100
Dates are logical, and there are no disputes. Some key fields are empty or marked as 'None', which are gaps rather than inconsistencies.
•Some key fields (e.g., procedure type, liable person) are empty
Sustainability50/100
The tender description includes a clear focus on innovation. However, it lacks explicit green procurement criteria and broader social aspects related to the supplier's operations or the solution's lifecycle.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No broader social criteria