Tenders

Services, Maintenance and Works Relating to UPS and Generators

Open
Deadline
38 days left
April 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
015789-2026
Value
£120,000
Location
West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Published
February 16, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 03, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£120,000
Duration
36 months
Location
West Yorkshire
Type
Other
61
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

WYFRS wishes to appoint a contractor for the provision of servicing, planned maintenance and repair of the UPS and Generators across WYFRS sites. The scope of services includes the verification of as installed information; planned inspection and testing to ensure that the Installation meets operational and safety standards; reactive maintenance including the provision of a 365/24/7 call out service to attend at an applicable site within the prescribed times. The services also includes provision for repairs, replacements, modifications and requested upgrades to the Installation.

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific information provided in the tender summary.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

61
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is clear on basic information but suffers from significant gaps in full tender documents and evaluation criteria, which reduces transparency and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The procedure type and CPV code are correct, and there are no disputes. However, the lack of access to full tender documents prevents a comprehensive legal assessment, though the mention of mandatory exclusion grounds is a positive sign.

Lack of access to full tender documents
Clarity55/100

The service description is clear, but the critical absence of detailed requirements beyond a general scope and, most importantly, the explicit lack of evaluation criteria, severely hampers clarity for potential bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Limited detail on specific requirements
Completeness60/100

Basic identifying information, financial details, and timeline are present. However, the core content—the actual tender documents (stated as 4 total but with 0 content/summaries) and detailed requirements/evaluation criteria—is missing from this summary, making it substantially incomplete.

No content/summaries for tender documents
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness50/100

The lack of access to the full tender documents and the explicit absence of evaluation criteria are significant fairness and transparency issues. Bidders cannot properly understand how their proposals will be judged. The absence of e-submission also creates a potential barrier.

Lack of access to full tender documents
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality60/100

The contract start date and duration are clear. However, the lack of electronic submission and direct document URLs makes the process less practical and potentially more cumbersome for bidders.

No e-submission
Document URL not provided
Data Consistency85/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. No disputes or suspensions are noted. The 'Liable Person' field is empty, which is a minor data gap.

Liable Person field is empty
Sustainability20/100

There is no indication of any green, social, or innovation criteria within the provided tender information, representing a complete absence of sustainability considerations.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear service description
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Standard open procedure type
Appropriate CPV code
No disputes or suspensions

Concerns

Lack of access to full tender documents
Missing evaluation criteria
Limited detail on specific requirements
No electronic submission option
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation considerations

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents are accessible and their content is summarized or provided.
2. Clearly define and publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Implement electronic submission for improved practicality and accessibility.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Loading competitor predictions...

Add to Pipeline