Acquisition of a server and its components

This tender for server acquisition demonstrates good adherence to basic procedural requirements but is significantly hampered by critical issues such as restricted document access and missing evaluation criteria, which severely impact fairness and clarity.

The tender defines an open procedure and has reasonable deadlines. It is EU Funded, suggesting adherence to broader regulations. However, the CPV code (software) is not perfectly aligned with the primary procurement item (hardware), and the estimated value is not disclosed, impacting transparency.

The tender description and performance conditions are clear, and requirements are referenced to specific documents. However, the critical issue of 'Missing evaluation criteria' significantly reduces clarity, making it difficult for bidders to understand how offers will be assessed.

Most basic information, deadlines, duration, and location are provided, and documents are listed. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the absence of clearly specified evaluation criteria represents a significant gap in completeness.

Fairness is severely compromised by 'Restricted document access' and 'Missing evaluation criteria'. Without full access to documents and clear evaluation criteria, bidders cannot prepare competitive offers transparently. The undisclosed estimated value further reduces transparency.

While the tender is EU Funded and specifies a clear duration, practicality is significantly hindered by 'Restricted document access' and the lack of a direct document URL. The contract start date is also not specified. E-submission appears supported despite a contradictory automated check.

Dates are logical, and there are no disputes. However, key fields like estimated value and evaluation criteria are flagged as missing. There is also a contradiction between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' automated check.

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. However, its 'EU Funded' characteristic suggests a baseline for higher standards, preventing a very low score in this category.