Playing Field Improvement Works at Ashfield Park and Southlands Recreation Ground, Standish, Wigan

This tender provides clear project details and supports electronic submission, but suffers from significant gaps in transparency and completeness, notably the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed eligibility or financial requirements.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and there are no disputes. However, the reveal date is missing, and the AI summary indicates a lack of specific mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds, which are fundamental for legal compliance and transparency. The absence of evaluation criteria also impacts compliance with transparency principles.

While the project description is clear, the tender notice lacks clarity regarding essential requirements. The AI summary explicitly states that specific mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements are not detailed, and critically, no evaluation criteria are specified, making it difficult for bidders to understand the full scope and assessment process.

The tender includes basic information such as title, organization, value, and deadlines. However, it is significantly incomplete due to the explicit absence of detailed mandatory exclusion, eligibility, financial requirements, and all evaluation criteria, which are crucial for a comprehensive tender package.

The tender supports e-procurement and discloses the estimated value, which are positive for fairness. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major concern, as it prevents potential bidders from understanding how their proposals will be judged, thereby undermining transparency and equal treatment. There is no indication of tailored requirements.

Electronic submission is supported, and key timelines like contract start and duration are clearly specified. A minor practical drawback is the absence of a direct URL for accessing the full tender documents, requiring bidders to navigate to a portal.

The tender exhibits good data consistency with most key fields populated and logical dates. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor omissions include an empty 'Liable Person' field and a missing code for the 'Type' field.

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives into the procurement process.