Tenders

Poland – Laboratory Reagents – Supply of reagents and materials and lease of equipment for the medical laboratory

Open
Deadline
1 days left
February 25, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
2026/S 16-50086
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Poland
Published
February 16, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 18, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 25, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
6 months
Location
Poland
Type
Other
62
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€57,338
Avg. Bids
1.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
78%
293,505 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Poland – Laboratory Reagents – Supply of reagents and materials and lease of equipment for the medical laboratory

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements could be extracted from the provided information.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements could be extracted from the provided information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements could be extracted from the provided information.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements could be extracted from the provided information.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements could be extracted from the provided information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de5a1d-7e39-5e43-d6d3-f500016afd29.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice for the supply of reagents and materials and the lease of equipment for the medical laboratory of the District Hospital in Biskupiec, specifying conditions, evaluation criteria, and submission deadlines.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

62
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for laboratory reagents and equipment lease demonstrates good foundational elements like e-procurement and comprehensive documentation, but suffers from significant clarity and completeness issues due to missing key requirements, evaluation criteria, and financial transparency in its summary.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender includes a CPV code and the European Single Procurement Document (JEDZ), suggesting an intent for compliance. However, the procedure type is ambiguously stated as 'None', and the estimated value is not disclosed, which are notable compliance weaknesses. No disputes or suspensions are reported.

Procedure type ambiguously stated as 'None'
Estimated value not disclosed
Clarity50/100

The main description is clear, but the AI-extracted requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission are all empty. Crucially, evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 'not specified'. This severely hinders bidders' understanding of the tender's core demands and assessment methods.

No specific requirements extracted for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, or submission
Evaluation criteria not specified
Completeness60/100

While 19 documents are attached, including a detailed Specification of Tender Conditions (SWZ) and contract drafts, the summary lacks critical information such as the estimated value, NUTS code, and easily extractable requirements and evaluation criteria. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

Estimated value not disclosed
No specific requirements or evaluation criteria extracted in summary
Fairness60/100

E-procurement is enabled, and full document access is provided, which promotes fairness. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly undermine transparency and the ability for bidders to compete on an equal and informed basis.

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Practicality70/100

Electronic submission is supported, which is a strong practical advantage. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date and specific financing information are not provided, and a direct document URL is not explicitly given in the snippet.

Contract start date not known
Financing information not available (estimated value)
Data Consistency70/100

The tender shows no disputes or suspensions, and dates are logically consistent (submission deadline relative to today's date). However, several key fields are unpopulated (Liable Person, NUTS Code), and the 'Procedure: None' entry is inconsistent with standard procurement practices. The CPV code is present but prefixed with 'N/A'.

Procedure type stated as 'None'
Missing Liable Person and NUTS Code
Sustainability30/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided information. This is a standard tender for medical supplies, where such criteria might be less common, but their absence results in a low sustainability score.

No green procurement aspects mentioned
No social criteria included

Strengths

E-Procurement enabled, promoting accessibility and efficiency.
Comprehensive set of 19 tender documents available for detailed review.
Clear title, reference number, organization, and main description provided.
CPV code is included for proper classification of goods/services.
Absence of disputes or suspensions, indicating a stable procurement process.

Concerns

Critical requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are not extracted or summarized, creating ambiguity.
Estimated contract value is not disclosed, hindering informed bidder assessment and transparency.
Evaluation criteria are not specified, significantly impacting transparency and fairness of the assessment.
Procurement procedure type is ambiguously stated as 'None', raising legal compliance questions.
Missing NUTS code and liable person, indicating incomplete basic information.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all critical requirements and evaluation criteria are clearly summarized in the main notice or easily accessible sections of the documentation.
2. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency and allow potential bidders to make informed decisions.
3. Clearly define and state the specific procurement procedure type to ensure full legal compliance and clarity for all participants.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Loading competitor predictions...

Add to Pipeline