United Kingdom14 days leftOpen

CoLP Mounted Section - Architect

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Inner London - East, United Kingdom

VALUE

£180,000

DEADLINE

February 16, 2026 at 23:59

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

71530000

REFERENCE

004931-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

52 Aldgate High Street has been identified as a key site for the relocation and development of the Mounted Unit’s facilities. The plan involves combining the vacant plot at 52 Aldgate with the neighbouring properties at 50-51 Aldgate High Street to create a unified and functional space. Located in the City of London, this development aims to provide a practical and well-integrated solution to support the Mounted Unit’s operational needs. The project is currently in the initial feasibility and site assessment phase. 52 Aldgate presents a highly suitable location for the Mounted Unit due to a combination of operational, logistical, and strategic advantages. Its central position ensures immediate access to the Square Mile, enabling rapid deployment of officers for ceremonial duties, crowd management, and high-visibility policing. The site benefits from rear access, providing a discreet and practical entry point for day-to-day operations, including the secure movement of horses and equipment. Crucially, there is sufficient space at the rear of the site to accommodate the parking and manoeuvring of the Mounted Unit’s horse box, a key operational requirement. In addition, the site offers enough capacity to consolidate all horse welfare and stabling needs under one roof, improving efficiency and care standards. There is also the potential to build commercial accommodation above the proposed stables; this is subject to feasibility and viability testing but raises the possibility of raising income, subject to market response. Together, these factors make 52 Aldgate a rare and strategically valuable opportunity to establish a long-term, purpose-built base for the City of London Police Mounted Unit. At present, significant effort is focused on engaging with Transport for London (TfL), the key stakeholder and landowner, to thoroughly understand the current condition, boundaries, and legal status of the site. This includes a detailed investigation into the complex network of underground utilities and transport services that run beneath and adjacent to the site, which are critical to informing design parameters and mitigating potential risks related to construction. Coordination with the TfL is ongoing to secure accurate mapping, service locations, and any operational constraints that may impact the project timeline and technical approach. This phase is vital for establishing a clear understanding of site-specific challenges and opportunities, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements, and setting the foundation for successful planning and delivery. Please see full Architect scope within tender documents.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly stated in the provided information.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidders must be qualified to provide architectural services for feasibility and development projects.
  • Bidders must be capable of providing construction consultancy services.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidders must demonstrate capability in conducting detailed feasibility and site assessment studies for complex urban developments.
  • Bidders must possess expertise in investigating and understanding complex underground utilities and transport services networks.
  • Bidders must have experience in coordinating with major stakeholders and landowners, such as Transport for London (TfL), for site mapping, service locations, and operational constraints.
  • Bidders must be capable of designing facilities that accommodate specific operational needs, including stabling, horse welfare, secure movement of horses and equipment, and horse box parking/manoeuvring.
  • Bidders should have the capability to assess the feasibility and viability of incorporating commercial accommodation within a mixed-use development.
  • Bidders must be able to deliver services for a project duration of 11 months.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, insurance) are explicitly stated in the provided information.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Bids must be submitted by 2026-02-16T23:59:00+00:00.
  • Bidders must address the full Architect scope as detailed in the tender documents.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

DOC
OCDS Record
OCDS Data004931-2026_ocds_record.json
Summary:
This OCDS record provides structured data about a tender issued by the City of London for construction consultancy services to develop a new Mounted Unit facility at 52 Aldgate High Street.
DOC
OCDS Release Package
Data004931-2026_ocds_release.json
Summary:
Download failed - no summary available
PDF
Official PDF Version
General Information004931-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
This document is a tender notice for architectural services to develop a new, purpose-built facility for the City of London Police Mounted Unit at 52 Aldgate High Street, currently in the feasibility and site assessment phase.
HTM
Tender Notice
Administrative Documents004931-2026.html
Summary:
This tender notice invites architects to provide services for the feasibility and development of a new City of London Police Mounted Unit facility at 50-52 Aldgate High Street, including stabling, operational space, and potential commercial accommodation.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

62
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides a clear project description but suffers from significant procedural and documentation gaps, notably the absence of evaluation criteria and electronic submission, which impact fairness and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance60/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and there are no disputes. However, the absence of an explicit reveal date, the lack of specified evaluation criteria, and the AI's note about no explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds raise significant concerns regarding transparency and full legal compliance.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity70/100

The project description is highly detailed and unambiguous, clearly outlining the scope and strategic importance. The AI-extracted requirements are also clear and understandable. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria significantly diminishes the overall clarity for bidders regarding how their proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100

While most basic information, financial details, and timeline elements are present, the tender is incomplete due to the critical omission of evaluation criteria. Furthermore, one of the listed tender documents failed to download, and minor fields like 'Liable Person' and specific procedure codes are missing.

No evaluation criteria specified
One tender document failed to download
Fairness55/100

Fairness is significantly compromised by the absence of evaluation criteria, which prevents bidders from understanding the basis of assessment. The lack of electronic submission creates an unnecessary barrier to equal access, and the failed document download further hinders full information access. The technical requirements appear project-specific rather than tailored.

No evaluation criteria specified
No electronic submission (e-submission)
Practicality60/100

The tender provides a clear contract start date and duration, which is practical for planning. However, the absence of electronic submission is a major practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders and the contracting authority.

No electronic submission (e-submission)
Data Consistency85/100

The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and no reported disputes. Most key fields are populated. Minor inconsistencies include the missing 'Liable Person' and specific procedure codes, as well as the absence of a reveal date.

Missing 'Liable Person' and specific procedure codes
Missing reveal date
Sustainability30/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles into the procurement process.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear and detailed project description
Well-defined CPV code and procedure type
Value, duration, and contract start date are specified
Requirements for technical capability are clear and relevant to the project
No reported disputes or suspensions

Concerns

Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Lack of electronic submission (e-submission)
Missing reveal date
One tender document failed to download
No explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish comprehensive evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Implement electronic submission capabilities to modernize the process and enhance accessibility.
3. Ensure all tender documents are accessible and provide a clear reveal date for full legal compliance.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
62/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes