United Kingdom18 days leftOpen

Heart of Horton - Park Activator

Tender Overview

LOCATION

West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

VALUE

£12,000

DEADLINE

February 20, 2026 at 17:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

79952100

REFERENCE

006370-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

This procurement is to secure the appointment of an Activity Plan Consultant (Park Activator) to produce an NLHF activity plan for Horton Park. Further information is available in the tender pack.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are provided in the given information.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The tender is open to all eligible bidders.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Be capable of acting as an Activity Plan Consultant (Park Activator).
  • Possess the expertise to produce a National Lottery Heritage Fund (NLHF) activity plan.
  • Demonstrate capability to develop an activity plan specifically for Horton Park.
  • Have experience or capability related to Cultural Event Organisation Services (CPV 79952100).
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific financial requirements for bidders are provided in the given information.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit the bid by the deadline of 2026-02-20 at 17:00:00 UTC.
  • Refer to the full tender pack for detailed submission instructions and required documents.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

HTM
Lot L-0000
General InformationL-0000.html
Summary:
This document provides an overview of the City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council's tender for an Activity Plan Consultant (Park Activator) to create an NLHF activity plan for Horton Park, with further details available in the tender pack.
DOC
OCDS Record
OCDS Data006370-2026_ocds_record.json
Summary:
This OCDS record provides structured data about the tender for an Activity Plan Consultant (Park Activator) for Horton Park, including buyer details and links to further information.
DOC
OCDS Release Package
OCDS Data006370-2026_ocds_release.json
Summary:
This OCDS Release Package provides structured, machine-readable data detailing the City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council's tender for an Activity Plan Consultant to develop an NLHF activity plan for Horton Park.
PDF
Official PDF Version
Administrative Documents006370-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
This procurement seeks to appoint an Activity Plan Consultant (Park Activator) to produce an NLHF activity plan for Horton Park, with an estimated value of £10,000 and a submission deadline of 20 February 2026.
HTM
Tender Notice
Administrative Documents006370-2026.html
Summary:
This document announces an open tender from City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council for an Activity Plan Consultant (Park Activator) to develop an NLHF activity plan for Horton Park, with a submission deadline of 20 February 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

63
Good

Tender Quality Score

Overall, this tender provides clear basic information and project description but suffers from significant gaps in crucial areas such as evaluation criteria and e-submission, impacting fairness and clarity. Key improvements are needed to enhance transparency and accessibility for potential bidders.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code appropriately, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of a reveal date and the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summary are minor compliance concerns.

Missing reveal date
No specific mandatory exclusion grounds provided in summary
Clarity60/100

The project description and technical capability requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders bidders' understanding of how proposals will be assessed, severely impacting overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location is provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the missing evaluation criteria and the lack of specific financial requirements in the AI-extracted summary.

Missing evaluation criteria
No specific financial requirements for bidders provided in summary
Fairness50/100

The absence of clear and objective evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as bidders cannot adequately prepare competitive proposals. Additionally, the lack of e-submission capabilities limits equal access and modern procurement practices.

No evaluation criteria specified
No e-submission
Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which is practical for planning. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback for potential bidders, increasing administrative burden.

No e-submission
Data Consistency70/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is an inconsistency in the estimated value (EUR vs. GBP) between the basic information and the official PDF, and some fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are empty.

Inconsistency in estimated value (EUR vs. GBP)
Liable Person field is empty
Sustainability20/100

The tender explicitly lacks any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, as indicated by the automated check results. This represents a complete absence of sustainability considerations.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and technical requirements
All basic tender information (title, reference, organization, value, duration) is provided
Multiple tender documents are available, including OCDS data
No disputes or suspensions reported

Concerns

Critical absence of evaluation criteria
Lack of electronic submission (e-submission)
Inconsistency in estimated value (EUR vs. GBP)
No explicit sustainability, social, or innovation considerations
Missing specific financial requirements and mandatory exclusion grounds in the summary

Recommendations

1. Publish clear and objective evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness for all bidders.
2. Implement electronic submission capabilities to enhance accessibility and efficiency of the procurement process.
3. Rectify the inconsistency in the estimated value and ensure all financial requirements are clearly stated in the tender documentation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
63/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes