85 Villa Street Refurbishment Works

This tender for refurbishment works is generally well-structured for a below-threshold open competition, offering good clarity and fairness through its e-sourcing platform and transparent pricing criterion. However, it exhibits some minor completeness and consistency issues, notably the missing reveal date and lack of sustainability considerations.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code clearly, and deadlines appear reasonable. No disputes or suspensions are noted. However, the summary lacks specific details on mandatory exclusion grounds, requiring bidders to consult full documents, and the reveal date is missing, which impacts transparency.

The project description is clear and concise. AI-extracted requirements are well-categorized and understandable. The evaluation criterion (100% price-based) is explicitly stated in multiple summaries, despite an automated flag suggesting otherwise.

Basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification are provided. Documents are linked and summarized. However, the reveal date is missing, and the 'Divided into Parts' characteristic is not elaborated, creating a minor inconsistency with the single-flat description. Detailed technical specifications and full contract terms are not visible in the provided summaries.

Full document access is provided via the e-sourcing portal, and the estimated value is disclosed. The requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company. The 100% price-based award criterion, while simple, is objective and transparent. Electronic submission is supported, ensuring equal access.

Electronic submission is fully supported through the Delta eSourcing portal, and direct URLs are provided. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. The main description is duplicated in 'Additional Info,' which is a minor redundancy but doesn't hinder practicality.

Key dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Most essential fields are populated. However, the 'Divided into Parts' characteristic conflicts with the single-flat description, and some minor fields like 'Liable Person' are empty. Automated flags regarding e-submission and evaluation criteria contradict the tender's explicit content.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards. This indicates a lack of emphasis on broader sustainability goals.