Visioning Training: Commission to develop and deliver training in using place and design principles

This tender is fundamentally incomplete due to the complete absence of tender documents, making it practically impossible for potential bidders to submit a compliant and competitive proposal. While the core objective is clear, critical information for the procurement process is missing.

The tender specifies an 'open competition' below threshold, which is generally compliant. However, the explicit mention that 'No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned' is a significant omission, as standard exclusion grounds are typically required by law or best practice.

The tender's title, description, estimated value, and contract duration are clear. The eligibility and technical capability requirements outline the desired expertise and abilities. However, the lack of detailed scope or specific deliverables beyond 'develop and deliver training' reduces overall clarity for bidders.

This tender is critically incomplete. The most significant issue is the complete absence of any tender documents, which are essential for bidders to understand the full requirements, terms, and submission process. Key information such as detailed scope, evaluation sub-criteria, and submission instructions are missing.

The general requirements for expertise in place/design principles and training delivery appear reasonable and not overtly tailored. The 60/40 quality/price split is common for consultancy services. However, the lack of detailed evaluation sub-criteria for the quality proposal introduces a risk of subjective assessment, potentially impacting fairness.

The tender's objective and duration are practical. However, the complete absence of tender documents makes it practically impossible for any potential bidder to prepare and submit a compliant and competitive bid. This is a fundamental barrier to participation.

The estimated value, contract duration, and CPV code are consistent with the tender's description and requirements. No internal inconsistencies were detected in the provided information.

The tender does not include any specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate broader public value considerations into the procurement process.