Legal Compliance100/100
The tender notice outlines an open procedure below threshold, which is legally sound. However, the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed financial requirements in the notice itself, referring bidders to an eTendering system, means the notice alone is insufficient for full legal compliance assessment.
•Notice lacks explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed financial requirements, referring to external system.
Clarity40/100
While the general description of services is clear, the eligibility and technical requirements are highly generic ("competent," "availability," "capability," "able to provide/deliver/meet KPIs"), lacking the specificity needed for bidders to fully understand expectations.
•Eligibility and technical requirements are vague and generic.
Completeness83/100
This is a major weakness. The tender notice explicitly states "No documents attached" and "No document content available." Crucially, evaluation criteria are missing, and specific financial requirements and mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed within the notice.
•No tender documents attached or available.
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Fairness60/100
The absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a significant concern for fairness, as it prevents bidders from understanding how their proposals will be assessed and could lead to subjective decision-making. Vague requirements also contribute to this.
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria, potentially leading to subjective assessment.
•Vague requirements may hinder fair competition.
Practicality40/100
The lack of detailed requirements and attached documents makes it impractical for suppliers to accurately assess the scope, prepare a comprehensive bid, or estimate costs effectively without accessing an external eTendering system.
•Impractical for bidders to prepare comprehensive proposals without full tender documents and detailed requirements.
Data Consistency100/100
The information provided is generally consistent, though the NUTS code being "N/A" for a specified location (Central Lancashire) is a minor omission.
•NUTS code listed as N/A despite a specific geographical location being mentioned.
Sustainability0/100
The automated checks explicitly flag "Not green procurement, No social criteria, No innovation focus," indicating a missed opportunity to incorporate broader sustainability and social value objectives.
•No explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria mentioned.