Legal Compliance100/100
The tender references standard mandatory exclusion grounds but lacks specific detail. A significant concern is the stated 'Restricted procurement type process for joining the DPS,' which fundamentally contradicts the open nature of a Dynamic Purchasing System, potentially limiting competition and legal compliance with DPS regulations.
•Stated 'Restricted procurement type process for joining the DPS' is inconsistent with the open nature of a DPS.
Clarity40/100
The overall scope and intent are clear, describing a broad range of fund types and public sector bodies. However, the specific requirements for demonstrating capability and expertise are high-level, lacking the granular detail typically found in full tender documents.
•High-level requirements without granular detail.
Completeness83/100
This is the primary weakness. The absence of any attached tender documents, detailed evaluation criteria, or specific financial thresholds renders the provided information incomplete for a thorough assessment.
•No tender documents attached.
•Missing detailed evaluation criteria.
Fairness80/100
Without detailed evaluation criteria, specific financial requirements, and the full tender documentation, it is impossible to fully assess the fairness of the process. The broad scope might inherently favor larger, established providers, but this cannot be confirmed as tailored without more information.
•Inability to fully assess fairness due to lack of detailed information.
Practicality40/100
The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System is a practical approach for managing diverse and evolving needs for fund administration services over a long contract duration across numerous public bodies. The broad scope allows for flexibility.
Data Consistency100/100
The most significant inconsistency is the stated 'Restricted procurement type process for joining the DPS,' which is contradictory to the definition and operational principles of a Dynamic Purchasing System, which should allow new suppliers to join at any time via an open procedure.
•Contradiction between 'Restricted procurement type process' and the open nature of a DPS.
Sustainability0/100
The provided information does not include any specific requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social criteria, or innovation, representing a missed opportunity for broader impact.
•No mention of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.