Development of land management projects for land units owned by Sigulda Municipality and cadastral surveying of newly formed land units

This tender presents significant concerns regarding transparency and fairness due to restricted document access and missing evaluation criteria, despite clear basic information and a reasonable submission timeline.

While the procedure type is open, deadlines are reasonable, and CPV codes are appropriate, the restricted document access and missing evaluation criteria pose significant risks to legal compliance, as these are fundamental requirements for transparent and fair procurement.

The tender's title, description, and the structure of AI-extracted requirements are clear. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria severely impacts the overall clarity for potential bidders, making it difficult to understand how offers will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, organization, value, duration, and location is complete. However, the tender is significantly incomplete for bidders due to restricted document access and the absence of defined evaluation criteria, which are crucial for preparing a comprehensive offer.

The disclosed value and reasonable submission deadline are positive. However, restricted document access and the complete absence of evaluation criteria are major impediments to fairness and transparency, severely compromising equal opportunity for all bidders. The flagged 'No e-submission' also detracts from equal access.

The tender's practicality is significantly hampered by restricted document access, making it difficult for bidders to obtain necessary information. The flagged 'No e-submission' also presents a practical hurdle for submitting offers, despite the duration and estimated value being specified.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there are critical inconsistencies, notably the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' being a characteristic and 'No e-submission' being flagged as an issue, and the discrepancy regarding the presence of evaluation criteria in document summaries versus flagged issues.

The tender does not include any specific criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, nor is it EU funded, indicating a lack of emphasis on sustainability considerations.