Development and author supervision of the construction project "Cleaning of the Svēte River bed, prevention of bank erosion and restoration of flow, and complex flood prevention measures in the Tērvete Street area, Jelgava"

This tender demonstrates good clarity and legal compliance, benefiting from EU funding and clear evaluation criteria. However, significant concerns regarding fairness arise from restricted document access and the undisclosed estimated contract value.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and provides reasonable deadlines. It is EU-funded, indicating adherence to higher standards. The main concern is the non-disclosure of the estimated value, which, while not always strictly mandatory for all tender types, is generally expected for full transparency. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

The project description is highly detailed and unambiguous, clearly outlining the scope and funding source. Requirements for eligibility, technical capability, financial proposals, and submission are well-documented and understandable, as are the evaluation criteria (80% price, 20% specialist experience). Performance conditions refer to specific documents, which are present.

All essential basic information, including title, reference, organization, and location, is provided. Deadlines and contract duration are clearly specified. All relevant tender documents are present and summarized. However, the estimated value of the contract is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for a complete tender overview.

While the evaluation criteria are objective (80% price, 20% specialist experience) and e-procurement is enabled, the 'restricted document access' and the non-disclosure of the estimated value significantly hinder transparency and equal access for all potential bidders. The long submission deadline is positive, and requirements do not appear tailored.

The tender supports electronic submission, which enhances practicality. Financing information and contract duration are clearly stated. However, the specific contract start date is not provided, and the flagged 'restricted document access' could pose practical challenges for bidders in obtaining full documentation.

Key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical and consistent throughout the tender information. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. While automated checks flagged some inconsistencies (e.g., 'missing evaluation criteria,' 'no e-submission'), these appear to be errors in the automated system rather than actual inconsistencies within the tender data itself. The only minor inconsistency is the missing estimated value.

The project is explicitly EU-funded under a climate change adaptation program (ERAF), focusing on flood prevention and river restoration, which inherently contributes to environmental sustainability. While specific 'green procurement' criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus are not detailed in the summaries, the nature of the project and its funding source align with broader sustainability goals.