Legal Compliance75/100
The RFI clearly defines its purpose and procedure type, adhering to market engagement principles. CPV codes are appropriate, and there are no disputes. Minor inconsistencies exist in the 'Type' and 'Procedure' metadata fields.
•Inconsistent 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields in basic information.
Clarity80/100
The RFI's purpose, objectives, and scope are exceptionally clear and unambiguous. Requirements are well-documented and understandable, accurately extracted by AI. As an RFI, formal evaluation criteria are not applicable.
Completeness70/100
Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, and a download link, is provided. However, the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are incomplete, and the estimated value/duration refer to a potential future contract, which could be clearer in context.
•'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are marked as 'None'.
•Estimated value and contract duration refer to a hypothetical future contract, which could be confusing without careful reading.
Fairness85/100
Document access is full, and the value is disclosed. Requirements are specific to CL3 labs but not tailored to a single company. The use of email for RFI responses, rather than a full e-procurement portal, slightly reduces the level of standardized equal access.
•RFI responses are submitted via email instead of a dedicated e-procurement platform.
Practicality65/100
While a document URL and future contract dates are provided, the reliance on email for RFI submission rather than a fully integrated e-procurement system for all interactions (questions via portal, responses via email) is a practical drawback.
•Electronic submission is not fully integrated; responses are via email.
Data Consistency90/100
Key dates are logical and consistent, and there are no disputes or suspensions. The main inconsistencies lie in the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields being unpopulated and 'Liable Person' being empty.
•'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' fields are empty or marked as 'None'.
Sustainability50/100
The RFI does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This is common for a technical capacity RFI but represents a missed opportunity for broader impact considerations.
•No explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus.