MANAGED VEHICLE RECOVERY SERVICE

This tender for a managed vehicle recovery service presents significant transparency and completeness issues, primarily due to the undisclosed estimated value and the critical absence of evaluation criteria, which severely impact fairness and clarity for potential bidders.

The tender defines the procedure and CPV code clearly, and no disputes are reported. However, the missing tender reveal date and the classified estimated value raise transparency concerns regarding full compliance with disclosure principles.

While the service description and core technical requirements are clear, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed, leading to significant ambiguity.

Basic tender information, deadlines, and duration are provided, and documents are available. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucially, evaluation criteria are entirely missing, making the tender incomplete for informed bidding.

Document access is available, and the submission period appears reasonable. Nevertheless, the classified estimated value and the complete lack of evaluation criteria severely undermine the objectivity and transparency of the process, potentially leading to unfair outcomes.

The contract start date and duration are clear. However, the contradiction regarding e-submission (E-Procurement vs. No e-submission) creates uncertainty, and the undisclosed estimated value hinders practical bid preparation.

Dates are logical, and no disputes are reported. However, several key fields are unpopulated (e.g., liable person, type code), and there is a direct contradiction regarding the availability of e-submission, indicating poor data consistency.

The tender lacks any explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a complete absence of sustainability considerations in the procurement process.