Tenders

Suffolk Appropriate Adults Service

Open
Deadline
30 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
017061-2026
Value
£600,000
Location
East Anglia, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Contract Start Date

September 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£600,000
Duration
24 months
Location
East Anglia
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Council seeks to retender its commissioned appropriate adults offer. The Council intends to commission a core service recruiting, co-ordinating, and training volunteers to provide Appropriate Adults as required for young people and vulnerable adults where entitled under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements are detailed in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The service requires recruiting, co-ordinating, and training volunteers.
--Volunteers will provide Appropriate Adults for young people and vulnerable adults.
--Service provision is in accordance with the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Value: 600000 EUR

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Suffolk Appropriate Adults Service is in the planning stage, outlining a clear service need and estimated value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to be in compliance with general procurement principles, with a clear CPV code and no immediate red flags regarding disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The deadline is noted as potentially short, which could be a minor concern for legal compliance if it impedes fair competition.

Deadline may be too short
Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, outlining the core need for recruiting, coordinating, and training volunteers. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements reduces overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
No specific submission requirements detailed
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the lack of detailed requirements, exclusion grounds, eligibility criteria, and submission specifics means crucial information is missing for potential bidders.

No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed
No specific eligibility requirements detailed
Fairness85/100

The tender is fair in that it discloses the estimated value and provides access to the tender documents (though content is not available). The criteria are objective in principle, but the lack of specified evaluation criteria could lead to perceived unfairness. There is no indication of tailored requirements for specific companies.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents hinders practical application. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission
Document URL not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these sustainability elements.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear service description and objective
All basic information present (title, ref, org, value, dates)
CPV code provided
No disputes or suspensions reported

Concerns

Missing detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, submission)
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of information on e-submission and document access
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and submission guidelines.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Specify the method for e-submission and provide direct links to all tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline