Tenders

Extra Care Services

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
016399-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom
Published
February 23, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Merseyside
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Council is seeking to appoint suitably experienced providers to deliver high-quality care and support services across five Extra Care Housing schemes within the Liverpool city boundary.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is in the planning stage and outlines a requirement for Extra Care Services. While generally well-structured with clear basic information and specified requirements, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial disclosure, impacting its completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender is in the planning stage, which inherently limits a full assessment of legal compliance. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of a reveal date and specified evaluation criteria could pose future compliance issues if not addressed before publication.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of services required is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of the expected submission components. The conditions for participation are generally outlined, but the lack of specific evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Key information such as the title, reference, organization, and CPV code are present. Contract duration and start date are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the content of the tender documents is not available, significantly hindering a complete understanding of the procurement.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is divided into parts, which can promote fairness. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the lack of specified evaluation criteria prevent bidders from fully assessing the opportunity and understanding the basis of selection. The absence of information on e-submission also raises concerns about accessibility.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are provided. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the unavailability of document content make the practical aspects of preparation and submission unclear. Financing information is also not detailed.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The planning status is consistent with the lack of detailed financial and evaluation information.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This suggests a lack of emphasis on these important sustainability considerations.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization details
Appropriate CPV code provided
Description of services is clear
Contract duration and start date specified

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
No document content available
Lack of information on e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Provide access to the full tender documentation and specify the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline