Legal Compliance100/100
The tender is critically deficient in legal compliance due to the complete absence of full tender documents, mandatory exclusion grounds, and evaluation criteria. This makes it impossible for bidders to understand the full legal framework and for the contracting authority to conduct a transparent and legally sound procurement process.
•No full tender documents available, making it impossible to assess full legal compliance.
•Mandatory exclusion grounds are not specified.
Clarity40/100
The description of the required service and the technical objectives are clear and well-defined. However, the overall clarity for bidders is extremely poor due to the complete absence of any supporting tender documents, submission instructions beyond a deadline, and financial requirements.
•Lack of full tender documents makes the overall tender process unclear for bidders.
•Submission requirements are minimal, lacking detail on format, content, and specific forms.
Completeness75/100
The tender is highly incomplete. Key elements such as full tender documents, estimated value, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing. This prevents potential providers from submitting comprehensive and competitive bids.
•No full tender documents are attached or available.
•Estimated value is not disclosed.
Fairness40/100
The fairness of this tender is severely compromised by the absence of evaluation criteria, which are essential for transparent and objective assessment of bids. The lack of full tender documents also creates an uneven playing field, as bidders cannot prepare informed submissions. The highly specific requirement for 'SFJ Awards Level 5 Certificate' could be seen as restrictive, potentially limiting competition to providers accredited by this specific awarding body.
•Absence of evaluation criteria undermines the fairness and transparency of the award process.
•Lack of full tender documents prevents bidders from preparing fair and comprehensive proposals.
Practicality40/100
From a practical standpoint, this tender is unworkable. Without full tender documents, bidders cannot understand the scope, terms, conditions, or submission process beyond a title and deadline. This makes it practically impossible for interested parties to prepare and submit a compliant bid.
•Lack of full tender documents makes it practically impossible for bidders to prepare and submit a compliant proposal.
•Absence of detailed submission requirements creates practical difficulties for bidders.
Data Consistency100/100
Within the limited information provided, the data is consistent. The title, description, and requirements consistently refer to the 'SFJ Awards Level 5 Certificate in Fire Investigation (RQF)' and the 24-month contract duration.
Sustainability0/100
No information regarding green procurement or social criteria is specified, indicating a lack of focus on sustainability aspects within this tender.
•No green procurement criteria specified.
•No social criteria specified.