Framework for Architectural Services for Pobl Group’s Residential Schemes

This tender for architectural services is generally well-structured with clear basic information, but it suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria and the lack of electronic submission, significantly impacting fairness and clarity.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and a missing reveal date pose significant risks to legal compliance, particularly regarding transparency and equal treatment principles.

The tender description and rebranding information are clear. While AI-extracted requirements are understandable, they lack specific detail, and the complete absence of evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Most essential information, including title, organization, value, duration, and documents, is provided. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria and minor gaps like the liable person and procedure type code reduce overall completeness.

The tender discloses the estimated value and its requirements appear generic, which supports fairness. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria introduces subjectivity and compromises transparency. The absence of e-submission also creates potential barriers to equal access.

Key dates like contract start and duration are provided. A significant practical drawback is the lack of electronic submission, which can hinder participation and efficiency. Financing information is limited to the estimated value.

The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and no reported disputes. Minor inconsistencies include an empty liable person field and a missing procedure type code.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a minimal focus on sustainability aspects.