RFQ 2025/53 - PEACEPLUS Cultural Programme - Voices of the Land - Poetry and songs from Crotlieve

This tender presents a generally well-structured cultural program procurement, but it is significantly hampered by the critical absence of clear evaluation criteria, which impacts clarity, completeness, and fairness.

Legal compliance is generally good, with a clearly defined open procedure, appropriate CPV code, and no reported disputes. However, the missing reveal date is a minor transparency gap.

The program description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders on how their submissions will be assessed and ultimately selected.

The tender provides all basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, duration, and attached documents. Nevertheless, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds represents significant gaps in completeness.

The tender discloses the estimated value and supports electronic submission via the MultiQuote platform, promoting accessibility. However, the absence of objective and transparent evaluation criteria severely compromises the fairness of the procurement process. The requirement for specific local cultural heritage expertise, while understandable for the project, could also limit competition.

The tender demonstrates good practicality, supporting electronic submission, clearly stating the contract start date and duration, and providing financing information. Document access is implied through the listing of documents.

Data is largely consistent across the provided information. Minor inconsistencies include empty codes for the procedure type and a contradiction regarding e-submission (AI-extracted requirement states MultiQuote, automated check flags 'No e-submission'). The missing 'Liable Person' field is also a minor gap.

The tender lacks explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects (beyond the inherent social value of a cultural program), or innovation focus. While the program itself contributes to cultural and social well-being, the tender does not require bidders to demonstrate their own sustainability practices.