Legal Compliance100/100
The use of a DPS is a legally sound procurement tool for recurring purchases. However, the tender states 'Restricted procedure' under 'Type' and 'Procedure,' which is inconsistent with a DPS, typically an open procedure. The absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided extract is a significant omission, as these are fundamental legal requirements.
•Inconsistency between 'Restricted procedure' and Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) nature.
•Lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds.
Clarity40/100
The description of the initial categories (Silt & Flood Detection Devices, Relative Track Surveying Devices) is clear and provides specific technical parameters. The process for joining the DPS and the potential for new categories is also clearly outlined.
Completeness75/100
The tender information is significantly incomplete. Key elements such as estimated value, detailed financial requirements, specific evaluation criteria for mini-competitions, and any supporting tender documents are entirely missing. The 'App' at the end of submission requirements suggests truncation.
•Estimated value not disclosed.
•No specific financial requirements detailed.
Fairness60/100
The DPS structure allows continuous supplier entry, promoting fairness. However, the requirement to qualify within Network Rail's Technology Supplier Qualification System (SQS) could be a barrier if the SQS itself is not transparent or overly burdensome. The broad right to add/remove categories could create uncertainty for suppliers.
•Potential for the Technology Supplier Qualification System (SQS) to be an opaque barrier if not transparently managed.
•Uncertainty for suppliers regarding future categories added to the DPS.
Practicality40/100
A DPS is a practical tool for the contracting authority to procure goods with evolving technological needs over a long period, allowing new suppliers to join. For suppliers, it offers continuous opportunities.
Data Consistency100/100
The primary inconsistency is the stated 'Restricted procedure' for a Dynamic Purchasing System. While a DPS can be set up under specific rules, calling it a 'Restricted procedure' is generally misleading for a system designed for open, continuous access.
•Inconsistency between 'Restricted procedure' and Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) nature.
Sustainability25/100
No specific sustainability or green procurement criteria are mentioned in the provided information.
•Absence of sustainability or green procurement criteria.