Zemgale, Latvia
Not disclosed
February 03, 2026 at 10:00
Other
163351
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender for annual flower seedlings is generally well-structured with clear requirements and evaluation criteria, but it suffers from a lack of transparency regarding the estimated value and potential restrictions on document access, alongside a complete absence of sustainability considerations.
The tender generally adheres to legal requirements with a clear procedure type and reasonable submission deadlines. However, the assigned CPV code is overly broad, and the non-disclosure of the estimated value, while not always a legal breach, deviates from best practice for transparency.
The tender is highly clear, with a precise description of the subject matter and well-documented requirements for each of the three parts. Evaluation criteria (lowest price) are explicitly stated, and technical specifications are detailed.
Most essential information, including title, organization, reference, and detailed requirements for each part, is provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is specified only as the year "2026" rather than precise start and end dates.
The fairness of the tender is significantly impacted by the "Restricted document access" flag and the non-disclosure of the estimated value, which can hinder equal participation and transparency. While evaluation criteria are objective, these access and transparency issues are notable.
The tender supports e-procurement, which is practical. However, the lack of a specific contract start date and financing information (due to undisclosed value) reduces its overall practicality for bidders planning their resources.
Key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical. There are minor discrepancies between automated flags (e.g., "No e-submission", "No evaluation criteria") and the explicit content, but the core tender data itself is consistent.
The tender does not include any explicit criteria or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, which is a missed opportunity to promote sustainable practices.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes