Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and no disputes are reported. It refers to UK public procurement regulations, indicating compliance with national frameworks. The missing reveal date and empty codes are minor administrative omissions.
•Missing reveal date
•Empty codes for procedure type
Clarity65/100
The project description and AI-extracted requirements are clear, detailed, and unambiguous, outlining key objectives and performance conditions. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders clarity for potential bidders.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100
Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, estimated value, duration, and location, is provided. All listed documents are available. The primary deficiency is the lack of defined evaluation criteria.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness55/100
While document access is provided and requirements are not overtly tailored, the absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity in the assessment process. The lack of e-submission creates an unequal playing field, and the financial value inconsistency can confuse bidders.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•No e-submission
Practicality65/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders and the contracting authority.
Data Consistency60/100
Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a notable inconsistency in the estimated value, stated as EUR 180,000.00 in basic info and £150,000 in an official document, which can lead to confusion. Empty codes for procedure type and missing liable person are minor inconsistencies.
•Inconsistency in estimated value currency (EUR vs GBP)
•Empty codes for procedure type
Sustainability55/100
The project inherently contributes to environmental sustainability through leachate treatment and includes social aspects by minimizing H&S risks. However, the tender does not explicitly incorporate broader green procurement criteria, innovation focus, or specific social clauses beyond the project's core objectives.
•No explicit broader green procurement criteria
•No explicit innovation focus