Legal Compliance75/100
The notice, as a preliminary market engagement (PME), is a legally compliant pre-procurement activity. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no disputes. However, the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields being 'None' represent a data classification deficiency, even if the description clarifies the PME nature.
•Missing formal procedure type and code
•Missing liable person
Clarity80/100
The description is exceptionally clear and unambiguous, explicitly stating its purpose as a preliminary market engagement and that participation is optional without affecting future tender eligibility. The AI-extracted requirements accurately reflect the PME nature, indicating no formal tender requirements.
Completeness70/100
Basic information, estimated value, duration, and location are all provided. Documents are attached. While formal tender requirements and evaluation criteria are absent, this is explicitly stated and justified by the notice's preliminary market engagement status, making it complete for its stated purpose.
•No formal tender requirements specified (justified by PME status)
•No evaluation criteria specified (justified by PME status)
Fairness85/100
The preliminary market engagement process itself promotes fairness by informing the market early and gathering insights, ensuring no requirements are tailored. Full document access is provided, and the value is disclosed. The optional participation ensures equal access without prejudice to future tenders.
•Automated check indicates no e-submission, which could impact equal access for formal tenders, though less critical for a PME questionnaire.
Practicality65/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the automated check flags 'No e-submission,' which is a practical drawback for any submission process, even for a questionnaire, suggesting a potentially less streamlined approach.
•No electronic submission explicitly supported (as flagged by automated check)
Data Consistency70/100
While dates and financial information are consistent, key fields such as 'Type,' 'Procedure,' and 'Liable Person' are unpopulated. This represents a significant data consistency issue for a procurement notice, even with the descriptive clarification of its PME status.
•Missing 'Type' and 'Procedure' classification
•Missing 'Liable Person'
Sustainability20/100
There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the tender information. The project is not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social criteria